In fact, Pashinyan accepts Azerbaijan’s main assertion that Armenia “bodies I have occupied the territories of Azerbaijan”. Surenyants

Nikol Pashinyan, on his issue to the former presidents, took the internal political debate to a level that Armenia’s national security could endanger. Political scientist Suren Surenyants wrote about this.

“His words,”If I have been involved in the war in 2018, the 18-year-old Armenian soldier was in the 2006 years of Armenia’s sovereign territory,” the domestic repetition was voiced as a literal repetition of Baku’s propaganda.

In this wording, the Prime Minister of Armenia actually accepts Azerbaijan’s main assertion that Armenia “occupied the territories of Azerbaijan”.

In fact, Pashinyan not only distorts the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, but also testified on Armenia’s international platforms, presenting us as“Aggressor” and“OKUPIT”։

This is not only politically dangerous, but also can have legal consequences.

Each word of the Armenian leader is perceived as an official position, and it can be used against us.

Pashinyan’s speech distorts the basis of the Nagorno Karabakh conflict. The Armenian soldier standing in Artsakh was not“In a foreign area”. He protected.

Physical security of the Armenian people,

. The right of the people of Artsakh to self-determination, which is a fundamental principle of international law.

The Nagorno-Karabakh conflict is based on the right to self-determination, which is enshrined in a number of important international documents.

● UN Charter (Article 1.2) – The principle of equality and self-determination of peoples,

● Decision of the UN General Assembly No. 1514 (1960) – Declaration of Liberation from Colonquility, where the right to choose their future freely,

● Helsinki Final Act (1975), according to which the equality and self-determination of peoples are an integral basis of international relations.

These documents show that the struggle of Artsakh’s Armenians can never be seen as“Capture“Or“BUDGET”, but there has been a legal right to secure one’s existence and future.

Pashinyan has created a very dangerous precedent.

Such words in the framework of the internal political quarrel turn into external threats.

Azerbaijan has been trying to persuade the world for a long time to issue“Occupation” It’s about.

When the Armenian leader uses such vocabulary, he involuntarily strengthens that propaganda, in fact speaking against Armenia on international platforms.

This word of Nikol Pashinyan shows that the words used in the internal political debate can turn into a state-threatening factor.

The Armenian society, the opposition, must clearly state that the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict has never been“Occupation” about. It was the right to self-determination and the security of the people. “